The trend, IMHO, is that bigger is better. Quantity over quality. Even though we might think smaller bands are deserving of these scores, but that's not being reflected in the actual handing out of scores!

Moderators: Trumpet Man 05, malletphreak, Hostrauser, instrumental director
I almost replied to this the other day, but left it alone. I think this is really a mistaken idea that is being put forth. First of all, the SMALL bands did NOT win all the stuff like you are being told.JenKozy wrote:Okay. So what has happend? We are talking about the smaller bands winning in the 80's and the 90's. What changed? Why are we not seeing these size bands breaking into the 90+ scores like the bands with 100+ kids? Take a look at the smaller classes. How many schools below class A have broken a 90???
The trend, IMHO, is that bigger is better. Quantity over quality. Even though we might think smaller bands are deserving of these scores, but that's not being reflected in the actual handing out of scores!
jcys wrote:In his book on band, McBeth says "Intonation is 3/4 balance." That tends to put small bands at a disadvantage right off. Because many small bands are not just small, they have fundamental instrumentation problems.
Can every current and future band director PLEASE memorize these two statements?crickett wrote:My band is small, my school is small. My band scores well. We generally score in the 90's. I convince kids to change instruments to balance the sound. Size is not everything.
I was in this band! And, you're right...Mr. Hobson was much more excited about the percussion win. Do you have any old photos/videos? Love to hear from you...Cardinal Regime wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:53 pmAt the 1982 Fairfield Band Review, which was in the Spring, my Chowchilla Redskin Marching band not only won the Grand Sweepstakes coming out of little ol' Class D. but our percussion section took 1st with a whopping 97.5. Our band director, Larry Hobson, was more stoked about our percussion score than the band winning Sweepstakes.