What do you look for in a person of the opposite sex?

nizmo · Post by **nizmo** » Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:29 pm

[UCI]-Mike wrote:I was just thinking what if someone started a singles thread on this board.

Hook up at band tournaments and concerts. haha

haha i think the "post a pic of yourself" thread would be kinda like that...

and safe sex isn't an oxymoron....just wrap it up and make sure both of you are ready for it.

MsNikki · Post by **MsNikki** » Sun Nov 24, 2002 9:58 pm

Phantom Phan wrote:I need to clarify my statement on statutory rape. The law is definitely needed, but in its current form is rigid and inflexible. To me, there is a BIG difference between a 21-year old sleeping with a 17-year old and a 50-year old sleeping with a 14-year old. But in the eyes of the law they are the same (felony statutory rape) and they get the same mandatory sentence (5 years in prison, IIRC). To me this is just absurd.

It's so stupid that it's ran that way. I know of someone who was one month from turning eighteen when her parents got her boyfriend for stat. rape. What is that, man?!

And, whether the adult was twenty or fifty, if the minor was willing then well good for them. No, I lie. Sixteen, sixteen should be the minimum. If they're under sixteen ... sorry for their luck. And the minor should recieve punishment as well ... I mean it takes two to tango, right? Egh, I dunno. This is a topic I can't get into without becoming extremely irritated. So I'll just stop while I'm ahead.

nizmo · Post by **nizmo** » Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:13 pm

i agree...around 18 and with consent is questionable. but the line has to be drawn somewhere right? if it goes to 16 now, whats stopping it from going to 14 in the future?

Hostrauser · Post by **Hostrauser** » Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:34 pm

nizmo wrote:if it goes to 16 now, whats stopping it from going to 14 in the future?

Elaborate your position. Why is that a problem?

nizmo · Post by **nizmo** » Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:55 pm

actually, i think i just dug myself into a hole. its hard to explain (i'm a bit tired).

i'll try again in the morning...

Hostrauser · Post by **Hostrauser** » Mon Nov 25, 2002 12:12 am

That's fine.

My argument is kinda based on the fact that 16 and 14 were considered perfectly acceptable ages for nearly 2,000 years, until the 20th century. I'm not saying that's right, wrong, or anything of the sort, I just curious as to why you would think it would be wrong (or a problem).

MsNikki · Post by **MsNikki** » Mon Nov 25, 2002 12:54 am

Just to let you know ... a MAN just told me this

"All women want security, and men want sex"

It's comments like that which start the stereotypes. And even more so when it's coming from the group it's directed at.

DJTyrant · Post by **DJTyrant** » Mon Nov 25, 2002 9:48 am

beautiful
lovely
nice
considerate
artistic (musicaly, art, drama, whatever is fine with me)
willing to work things out (this is a must in ANY relationship)
sense of humor
beautiful eyes
proportionaly correct

westlakewoodwindcaptain · Post by **westlakewoodwindcaptain** » Mon Nov 25, 2002 4:07 pm

DJTyrant wrote:beautiful
lovely
nice
considerate
artistic (musicaly, art, drama, whatever is fine with me)
willing to work things out (this is a must in ANY relationship)
sense of humor
beautiful eyes
proportionaly correct

FInally, we are back to what we need to make this topic stay ON TOPIC!!!

WLwwcap

DJTyrant · Post by **DJTyrant** » Mon Nov 25, 2002 4:57 pm

I didn't even bother looking at this last page...but now that i've read it it's quite interesting!

Hostrauser · Post by **Hostrauser** » Mon Nov 25, 2002 7:51 pm

westlakewoodwindcaptain wrote:FInally, we are back to what we need to make this topic stay ON TOPIC!!!WLwwcap

Perhaps you didn't notice that this is the "Off-Topic Discussions" forum?

DJ-PsiLon · Post by **DJ-PsiLon** » Tue Nov 26, 2002 12:33 am

Phantom Phan wrote:
westlakewoodwindcaptain wrote:FInally, we are back to what we need to make this topic stay ON TOPIC!!!WLwwcap
Perhaps you didn't notice that this is the "Off-Topic Discussions" forum?

Here anything goes short of anything not socially acceptable as in swearing, flame bait, trolling and such.

westlakewoodwindcaptain · Post by **westlakewoodwindcaptain** » Tue Nov 26, 2002 7:19 am

I meant to stay on the topic of what the topic was about, even though it is off-topic, not necessairly meaning on topic while being off-topic but then again, maybe it does? Who knows what they mean by off-topic. It could be so vauge that it could hint away at on topic things despite that there is no real point in calling it on or off topic. Having off topic really takes away the point because how can we have a topic to begin with?

WLwwcap

Cole167888 · Post by **Cole167888** » Tue Nov 26, 2002 4:04 pm

shorter than me...thats really hard, im 5 1...

it doesnt matter tho, lol theres 4 or 5 girls shorter than me and ive gone out with 2 of them

nizmo · Post by **nizmo** » Tue Nov 26, 2002 8:22 pm

Cole167888 wrote:shorter than me...thats really hard, im 5 1... it doesnt matter tho, lol theres 4 or 5 girls shorter than me and ive gone out with 2 of them

daaaym. i was 5'1 in like middle school...

World of Pageantry

What do you look for in a person of the opposite sex?

wut i look for in girls

Re: wut i look for in girls