World of Pageantry

Posted: **Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:48 am**

mkosbie wrote:So, apparently, most of the people this message is targeted at won't ever see it... but...

You're following the most counter-productive line of reasoning I've ever heard. Rather than coming to the table with a "bigot" - one who has repeatedly emphasized that he thinks there's a solution agreeable to both parties (ie civil unions for all, marriage by religious institutions only) - you've all chosen to pretend his positions don't matter. I mean, wait "for us all to die off"? Really? That's mature.

If you're complaining about my moral arguments on homosexuality, then don't make the moral arguments. I'm quite capable of keeping my personal moral views out of the argument (you'll note I've only mentioned them when attacked). Are you?

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck.........

Posted: **Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:13 pm**

No, we're just going to focus our efforts on people who will actually listen.

Posted: **Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:35 pm**

your "religious institution" has the right to choose to not marry same sex couples. The government should not.

Like I said, replace "gay" or "same sex" with black and see if it sounds reasonable to you.

your "solution" only compromises the rights of gays as equals. And from what I can see (protests in the streets) it is NOT agreeable to both parties.

QUACK QUACK

World of Pageantry

Big Ol' Can of Worms (aka California Propositions)

Re: Big Ol' Can of Worms (aka California Propositions)

Re: Big Ol' Can of Worms (aka California Propositions)

Re: Big Ol' Can of Worms (aka California Propositions)