NCBA rule proposal #3

Conversations about the fabulous art of color guard, both field and court

Moderators: laurab, Gallagher, guardthepiccolo

Post Reply
brian_aguilar
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

NCBA rule proposal #3

Post by brian_aguilar » Sun May 16, 2010 5:50 pm

Feedback welcome!




Proposal Title: Judges Membership
Proposed By: Brian Aguilar
Date: 5/15/10
Fiscal Impact: $45 per judge that is not a member of NCBA
Impact: expand judging pool

Proposal:
I propose that being a judge not require being a member of the NCBA.

Reasoning:
No other association requires their judges to pay membership dues to the association. This proposal will expand the judging pool. This will be particularly helpful as we get to events such as the Winter Championship show where the judge pool gets very thin. Since the vast majority of NCBA judges must be members for other reasons we wouldn't lose very many members, but would regain a few of the high quality judges that we have lost, or been unable to attract, since they had no other reason for being a member.

Post Reply